SAME-DAY PLAN REVIEW · 16 DISCIPLINES · ONE PASS

The problem is already in the drawings.
The only question is when you find it.

Nobody on the job has the hours to read every sheet against every other. Flikt does. Find it now and it’s a redline; find it in the field and it’s an RFI, a hold, and a change order against a schedule you already committed to. The list comes back the same day, and every finding cites its sheet. 2D PDFs, no 3D model.

Nobody has the hours to read every sheet against every other. Flikt does, the same day. Find it now and it’s a redline; in the field it’s an RFI and a change order. Every finding cites its sheet. 2D PDFs, no 3D model.

LIVE PORTAL · SAMPLE SETREVIEWED BY FLIKT
HOW IT WORKS

Upload the set. Get back findings you can check.

A coordination conflict is never on one page — it lives between pages. Flikt holds every sheet against every other sheet in one pass, and cites exactly where to look, so the person who was supposed to read the set can check the call instead of hunting for it.

01

Submit

THE DOCUMENTS YOU ALREADY ISSUE

Drop in your 2D PDF plan set, along with the specifications, manuals and reports that go with it. No BIM model, no CAD conversion, no special export — the flat documents your field crews actually build from.

02

Scan

EVERY SHEET × EVERY OTHER SHEET

Flikt cross-checks all 16 disciplines in a single pass — where systems collide, where the drawings miss code, where scope falls through the cracks. And not just the drawings: specifications, manuals and reports are read against the sheets, so a spec that contradicts a plan is caught too. Here is a real finding, exactly as it appears in the demo report:

Multifamily floor plate with unit walls and UL assembly tags; the region containing the flagged fire-rated floor-ceiling assembly is outlined
CRITICALCODE VIOLATION

Plumbing pipe penetrations through fire-rated floor-ceiling assembly require firestop coordination

All floor-ceiling assemblies throughout apartment buildings.

SHEETS1 — structural general notes
CROSS-REFC5 UL floor-ceiling assembly · C7 firestop system
CONFLICTPlumbing × Structural
EXPOSURE$66,000–$153,615 estimated rework
See finding F018 in the demo Cypress Bend Apartments ↗
REAL FINDING · REAL SHEET · FULLY ANONYMIZEDEVERY CALL NAMES ITS SHEET AND LOCATION
03

Save

SAVE TIME · SAVE MONEY · REDUCE RISK

Every conflict fixed on the plans is one you do not pay for in the field.

  • TIMESame-day turnaround, so the fix lands in this revision — not the next one.
  • MONEYA redline on paper instead of a change order in the field.
  • RISKFewer RFIs, fewer delays, fewer surprises at inspection.

“Confirmed: the clash … was caught by Flikt.AI pre-construction, was missed in the field, and was resolved with a built-in interior soffit.”

Rose Remodeling and ConstructionPresident and General Contractor
Rose Remodeling and Construction, LLC · Read the case study
04

Share

ONE LINK, WHOLE TEAM
ACCURACY YOU CAN CHECK
5 of 5

findings independently reviewed and confirmed as legitimate coordination issues by the general contractor — South Florida commercial retail set.

WHO BUILT THIS

Built by a licensed general contractor and attorney — someone who’s red-penned plan sets and lived what a missed conflict costs.

Every finding cites the sheet and the detail, so you check the call yourself.
TRUSTED BY TEAMS AT
FAQ

Questions, answered.

We don’t have anyone whose job is to review the set. Is that what this is for?+

Yes. That is the most common reason a set comes to us: the owner or PM who would read it has forty other things on the job, or the person hired to do it does not have the hours. The review reads every sheet against every other and hands back a cited list; your team spends its time on the calls, not the page-turning.

Do I need a BIM model?+

No. Flikt.AI works directly on 2D PDF plan sets — the documents that actually get built from. You don’t need a Revit or Navisworks model. Over 85% of construction field work is still done from 2D PDFs, and that’s where Flikt operates.

What types of conflicts does Flikt.AI catch?+

Flikt cross-references your full plan set across every discipline and flags the coordination gaps that turn into RFIs and change orders: spatial clashes and MEP routing; elevation-vs-floor-plan and grading mismatches; missing coordination and deferred-scope gaps; code-citation and threshold issues (wrong code edition or jurisdiction, IBC egress capacity, panel and feeder sizing, ventilation rates, drainage inverts) and missing code-required documentation; spec-to-drawing mismatches; material and finish inconsistencies; and drawing-completeness gaps — sheets listed in the index but missing from the set, and detail or section callouts that point to a detail that isn’t there.

How is Flikt.AI different from BIM clash detection?+

BIM clash detection (Navisworks, Revit) requires 3D models and only catches spatial conflicts. Flikt.AI works from 2D PDFs and catches a broader set: spec-vs-drawing mismatches, missing details, code-citation and threshold checks, missing code-required documentation, and traditional clashes — across the documents your field team actually uses.

A revision just landed. Can I see what changed?+

Yes. Upload the revision and Flikt re-reviews it against the previous version: which findings were resolved, which are still open, which are new, and which it could not re-check because a sheet they depended on was not in the upload. Those stay open rather than being quietly marked resolved. A side-by-side view puts both revisions next to each other with the findings pinned on each. Project Coverage includes every re-review while the project is live.

How long does a plan review take?+

Same-day for all plan sets. Hundreds of sheets across every discipline in a single pass — hours, not the weeks a manual review takes.

How accurate is Flikt.AI?+

Accuracy you can check beats a number you have to trust. Every finding cites the exact sheets and location, so your team can confirm or dismiss each one in seconds. We rank by severity so Critical and High-severity issues surface first, and we manage false positives actively rather than pretend they don’t exist. Reports are recommended as a supplement to professional review, not a replacement.

How much can AI plan review save on a project?+

Decisions made on bad data drove $88.69 billion of rework in 2020, about 14% of all rework performed that year (Autodesk and FMI, 2021). The same study puts avoidable rework at up to $7.1 million a year for a contractor with $1 billion in revenue. Catching even a handful of conflicts before mobilization returns many times what a review costs.

See all FAQs

Find it while it’s still a redline.

Same-day turnaround · every finding cites its sheet · no model required.

See your conflicts before the field does — first preview is free.
1